KAAKA 772 LIMITED

Company Number

11022553

Status

Dissolved

Incorporation Date

Please log in to see this data

Dissolution Date

Please log in to see this data

Company Type

Private Limited Company

Jurisdiction

United Kingdom

Ultimate Beneficial Owners

5 UBOs listed, please log in to see this data

Registered Address

Ambe House
Commerce Way
Edenbridge
TN8 6ED
Kent
United Kingdom

Industry Codes

64.20/9: Activities of other holding companies (not including agricultural, production, construction, distribution and financial services holding companies) n.e.c. (UK SIC Classification 2007)
64.20: Activities of holding companies (European Community NACE Rev 2)
6420: Activities of holding companies (UN ISIC Rev 4)

Latest Accounts Date

2020-10-31

Inactive Directors / Officers

2 officers available, please log in to see this data

Interested in using our data at scale?

Get fresh, standardized, and traceable data directly into your workflows.

Access complete registry updates instantly through our trial services:

Automate live data via our API Integrate and test real-time workflows instantly.

Download sample data for bulk Get clean CSV formats to evaluate performance at scale.

Statements of control (by this company)

Date	Description	Mechanisms
2017-10-19	KAAKA LIMITED (United Kingdom) controls KAAKA 772 LIMITED (United Kingdom)	Share Ownership, Voting Rights, Right To Appoint And Remove Directors	details
2017-10-19	Mr Bemal Patel controls KAAKA 772 LIMITED (United Kingdom)	Right To Appoint And Remove Directors	details
2017-10-19	Mr Atish Patel controls KAAKA 772 LIMITED (United Kingdom)	Right To Appoint And Remove Directors	details

Filings

16 filings available, please log in to see this information

Industry codes

Code	Description	Code scheme
64.20/9	Activities of other holding companies (not including agricultural, production, construction, distribution and financial services holding companies) n.e.c.	UK SIC Classification 2007		details

* While we strive to keep this information correct and up-to-date, it is not the primary source, and the company registry should always be referred to for definitive information