Nabo Farm Invest II ApS

Company Number

42118893

Status

OplØst Efter ErklÆring

Incorporation Date

Please log in to see this data

Dissolution Date

Please log in to see this data

Company Type

Anpartsselskab

Jurisdiction

Denmark

Registered Address

c/o Casper Loiborg
Fagerbo 30
Vedbæk
2950
Denmark

Industry Codes

64.30.30: Investment funds (Dansk Branchekode 2007)
649910: Investering for egen regning (Dansk Branchekode 2007)
64.30: Trusts, funds and similar financial entities (European Community NACE Rev 2)
6430: Trusts, funds and similar financial entities (UN ISIC Rev 4)
64.99: Other financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding n.e.c. (European Community NACE Rev 2)
6499: Other financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding activities, n.e.c. (UN ISIC Rev 4)

Previous Names

Nabo Farm Invest II ApS

Inactive Directors / Officers

8 officers available, please log in to see this data

Interested in using our data at scale?

Get fresh, standardized, and traceable data directly into your workflows.

Access complete registry updates instantly through our trial services:

Automate live data via our API Integrate and test real-time workflows instantly.

Download sample data for bulk Get clean CSV formats to evaluate performance at scale.

Industry codes

Code	Description	Code scheme
64.30.30	Investment funds	Dansk Branchekode 2007		details
649910	Investering for egen regning	Dansk Branchekode 2007	historic	details

Shares issued

Shareholder	Number Of Shares	Voting Percentage
Jakob Heiberg Invest ApS (Denmark)	unknown	15.00% – 19.99%	details
Harry Vangberg (Denmark)	unknown	10.00% – 14.99%	details
LOIBORG HOLDING ApS (Denmark)	unknown	5.00% – 9.99%	details
INARA HOLDING ApS (Denmark)	unknown	10.00% – 14.99%	details
Harry Vangberg (Denmark)	unknown	10.00% – 14.99%	details

See all (10 records)

Shareholdings in other companies

Shares Held In	Number Of Shares	Voting Percentage
Nabo Farm ApS (Denmark)	unknown	5.00% – 9.99%		details

* While we strive to keep this information correct and up-to-date, it is not the primary source, and the company registry should always be referred to for definitive information